@vicharris, LOL, I've left myself open to getting this wrong now :).

1. (26.mov): 25
2. (30.mov): 12
3. (28.mov): 35

The 12 is pretty easy to spot as there's a tonne of background that can be seen. 25 and 35 would be harder to differentiate without the reflections (you're much smaller in number 3).

@P13DM I don't think there's a single anamorphic that will suit the 25/0.95. The only models that will give clarity across the frame without vignetting will mean using them at f4 and above (LA7200, Century etc). Isco, Bolex, Kowa, all won't work at 25mm with the Voigtlander or SLRMagic. I don't even think they'll work with the GH3 (slightly larger crop), but there's hope on the BMCC.

I've confined my anamorphic shooting to a rack free zone. It's just a different way of shooting. I'm planning on using a jib to add motion and keep a little more DOF, which as you know MFT is perfect at doing. If I ever get funding, I might plump for a Isco 36 and get on the rack, but until then....no :).

My anamorphic set consists of Canon FD 28/2, 35/2, 50/1.4, 50/3.5 Macro, 85/1.8, 135/2.8, 80-200/4 L, all shot with a Bolex 16/32/1.5x. And I'm using a Tokina 11-16 with an LA7200 for wides.

I'm building a spherical prime set (that will rack focus) using Voigtlander 25/0.95, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 50/1.4 AIS, Samyang 85/1.4. Still to get the 35 and 50.

@kholi, Ah Man i'm so jealous :) I can just imagine what you can do with those lenses and the BMC. Should clean up those low light shots.

No cats, I've been trying to get something together to shoot... everything's falling through and I'm still in pre-production on my WebSeries. @mintcheerios -- Yeah Beta Tester, it's been great! I also can't WAIT for 35/0.95 SLRMagic.

Here's a DNG from the 25/0.95 wide open, 800 ISO, 180 shutter -- https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8-f...it?usp=sharing

@griplimited

You shouldn't have any issues with infinity, what you may encounter are strange reflections but likely that won't be a problem, either.

I'm also pretty amazed at the wide open performance of the 25 HyperPrime. I would say that it's excellent from 0.95 to 5.6, which is where the performance really should be. The lens does have its share of CA, but I can pull nearly one-hundred percent of the CA out in Resolve in less than sixty seconds, so it's a non issue for me.

I know this isn't the topic, but the 12/1.6 looks amazing on Blackmagic, as well. FAR far better than the Tokina 11-16/2.8, wide open.

Yes SM 25mm 0.95 has some strange flares. It gets more weird & ugly (fugly) as aperture ring is narrowed. At f/4 or higher, I'd prefer CV 25mm 0.95. This SM lens is really optimized toward the wide aperture like f/2.8 or faster. I wish to keep both lenses, but I had to sell Voigtlander lens to fund for SLRMagic lens.

For the price the SLR, but every time I see that flare gives me pain in the eyes and continuing saving for Nokton.

@Stonebat, to f1.4 the flare type riple is maintained?

@P13DM I agree. From examples, the flare seems much less than the 12mm. Even if it has some flare, it could be nice for certain projects, but then I wouldn't throw my Nokton away either.

SM 25mm and CV 17.5mm complement each other. ebay sells CV 17.5mm new and FS at $940.

a short video for a short trip to Cappadocia, Turkey. Mostly shot with the aforementioned lens:

@kholi Is that Abbot Kinney?

@kholi Nice, I live pretty close by Sony. I was just showing another guy from PV this lens today as well as the 12 and 35mm. I tried to go to Venice last week to get some footage with the 25mm but didn't like anything I got. This stuff looks pretty damn good man.