na na,...see some patches are so stable with any lens temp and so on, just with class 10 30 m/s cards and above,.... i opened this topic to tag these patches separate from total numbers,... got it???? (i meant the very stable patch class 10 30m/s and above cards with gh2)

I doubt you will get many responses on this. The fact is that not many people really care about a patch that is rock solid for every card, and every lens, in every situation. That is because they can just spend a couple of extra dollars and get a faster card.

They probably don't own every lens either. And they probably don't shoot in every type of situation. What they want is a hack tailored to their specific needs and their specific scenarios.

The hack you requested was made and was thoroughly tested with nearly every card, and almost all lenses, in every scenario imaginable. It never fails which is actually saying something because even the stock V1.0 firmware will fail with some class 6 cards. The no adverse affects settings won't fail at all. However, that really is not that important to most people.

This firmware is the firmware that the GH2 should have shipped with in the first place. It is more reliable than Panasonic's own firmware at twice the bit rate.

http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/953/gh2-patch-vault-most-popular-patches-in-one-place#Item_5

I've received a number of helpful reliability reports from testers on Flow Motion v1.0 and I'm currently fine-tuning patch revisions intended to function reliably in extreme cases and combinations of modes. In my experience, there are a number of difficult use cases that require significantly more conservative patch settings:

• ETC mode, particularly in 720p & 1080i
• High ISO, enabled by the ISO limit patch
• Fast shutter speeds, above 1/60 sec
• Native M4/3 distortion-corrected lenses
• 4GB file-spanning at bitrates > 50Mbps

I'd like to propose that video modes 24L (1080p), FH (1080i), and H (720p) be designated as the default modes for supporting all combinations of the above cases in GH2 patches.

In addition, patches that exhibit stable behavior in Fallback Mode when forced to operate at excessively high bitrates should be considered reliable. Of course, for less demanding patches, any of the above cases can be optionally supported in the high quality recording modes as well. Standardizing on this approach will allow modes 24H, FSH, and SH to be reserved for highest-quality patch optimizations designed for cinematic filming conditions:

• Manual-focus lenses
• ISO 1600 and below
• Shutter speed 1/60 sec and below
• Non-ETC video modes
• Individual takes of 3 minutes or less

@dbp Aquamotion v2 is not a stable one, i tested it 2 days ago and i am sure abt it. aquamotion v1.0 is good. and its stable to a extend. i feel this gentle man should try quantum100+Nine and Quantum v9b+Nine. Nine is a gh2-x patch finalized and tested by sage. i found quantum 100+ Nine is the best for any class 10 30 m/s cards and above. here find quantum 100 + Nine below.

@rajamalik or anyone who has tried it, How does the 88Mbit hold up with really high detail ? Thats a very low bitrate for a GOP1 patch. I can't test at the mo as I'm in the middle of a project. I mean.. the size of your I-frames, your compression, is going to be about the same as those in the stock settings.

@stray yep i tried 88mbit. its not a super quality patch. its much better than 44mbit for sure. see quantum 100 + Nine this patch is modified and tested by sage. the best patch u can get. it has fantastic quality in 720 slow motion and records 1080 24p h in 100 mbit & 50 mbit in lower setting,....quality is not compromised....almost similar to quantum v9b and Nine looks great in 720P,....

rajamalik 10:31AM Aquamotion v2 is not a stable one, i tested it 2 days ago and i am sure abt it. aquamotion v1.0 is good. and its stable Jep that is my experience also.

But Nine dident work ad all, lot off errors.
and Quantum v9b did work great...

All i can say is, @balazer is absolute right.....

@dbp yes as for as stability, spanning and quality is concerned. quantum 100 + Nine is the best patch. this patch also supports long time recording as it does only 100Mbit through. i dont have a youtube channel. i will upload few of my videos soon with this patch. camera panning burst mode and best quality slow motion possible. i am sure it does superb in a 45m/s class 10 card. about 30 m/s you have to check but, according to driftwood quantum 100 spans in 30m/s. i used 14-140 g kit lens. try 1080 24p H today and tell me. it works and it is stable.try this and comment down.

i have also a sandisk 45m/s card (8gb), but nine did give errors.
Further i did not see any improvement from driftwood settings?

@lpowell : I understand perfectly your proposal and I support it. Even the stock settings sometimes face issues on less than stellar SD cards. We are happily using patches that stretch the bit rate in orders of magnitude from stock, it's nigh on impossible to have "Rock Solid" patches if we don't have conditions scenarios. Perhaps we should also settle on an Full HD "animated" torture chart as the minimum benchmark.

@dbp I never tried this. I wish to know this too,.. @duartix see anyone who wish to take a shot in 1080p shld always have the requirements. A sdhc class 10 30m/s or above is essential. Saying stock is not stable in slower card sounds childish. It is like saying a gun shld shoot with any bullet we load. Capability stands apart. Here we discuss rock solidity with capable sdhc and sdxc. :)

@duartix u r right sir. But my topic is not about gun and bullet. This topic is for people who has a gh2 + 30mb/s or faster c10 Sd cards. I tested many patches which are very stable and rock solid end to end . Did u ever tried 44mbit driftwood?? Anyway if u had tried all post samples here don't act smart without proving anything @rajamalik and @duartix both of u. Rock solids are there. Post or be away.