i cant find that topic. if it is a post in a topic, a will never find it...

but if i set it higher then 50fps, then double frames starts to appear.

will test it against a fast moving object, in real live. ad home dosen't work so great :lol:

Damn it did look good, but indeed, things are speeded-up...

works great. but do you set ask for extended options after this dialog
+ i use the ffshow codec with the standard settings.
witch is set to mjpeg (fourcc)
Maxium iframe of 250
and minimum iframw interval is one.
there is a option to save it as raw frames (but i never used that).

And i never use 50i this was just to test something out...
But rendering take way to much time....(more then one minut per frame).

Very important if you use AVISynth to care about decoder!!! CoreAvc Pro seems to be a must instead of using ffdshow. Otherwise you will see a lot of rubbish. Starting from 50i / 60i Yadif gives then wonderful deinterlaced 50p/60p or slowed down to 25p/24p a slow motion rate of 2x/2.5x.

Subsequent usage of "Interframe method" http://www.spirton.com/category/interframe/ shows very good results at 4x / 5x even with complicated scenes. Important is also to use a shutter speed of at least 1/100s / 1/125s.

By the way transforming 60i to 60p (by Yadif) and then to 120p (by Interframe method) and subsequent 5x frame blending (by temporalsoften method) leads to high quality 24p. (60i --> 24p :-)

Does somebody know other alternatives to CoreAvc Pro....

Thanks @balazer I will try it, QTGMC seems to be one of the latest developements which includes motion estimation. I'm wondering if a 60i --> 24p transformation via 120p would give a better low light (especially high iso) performance than natural 24p. Maybe neat video should be used directly after 60p deinterlation. Then the subsquent motion estimation to 120p. The final 5 times blending should then reduce some additional noise. Did somebody tried this in the past.

Would me wonder if finally 60i outperforms 24p in lowlight....

@duartix @MrEdd in virtualdub the clip short the clip, doesent that help?

@MrEdd i have done clips of more then 1000 frames, i export to ffmpeg (i must try dnxhd someday)
and i used clips that where shot on Driftwood GOP1 AQ2 'AQUAMOTION' Experimental patch/settings.

@MrEdd : My usual workaround is to crop a few frames from the end of the video using those buttons that @mozes showed you.

About 720p vs 1080i, @mpgxsvcd (which I consider to be an expert on this issue) has much higher regards for 720p, not only temporal wise but resolution wise too. If it's slow motion then it's 720p60...

Use the highest shutter you can with twixtor. 1/500, even 1/1000 if you can. Shoot 60p, too. Makes a big difference.

Here's a vid of my cat jumping around. Some shots 60p conformed to 24p, then slowed to as low as 2% in Twixtor.

@duartix Yeah, there is some warping, but that's a very quick and dirty example. Twixtor is really cool, in that you can use after effects to mask around the subject and isolate it, which helps greatly eliminate the warping. Of course, it's pretty tedius, but it's nice to have that option for serious work.

@duartix It is time consuming, depending on the shot. You have to mask out the subject in the slow mo layer, the regular motion layer, and you have to adjust it frame by frame depending on the background. My cat video above didn't use any masks or advanced techniques like that. By the looks of it, you can get much better results if you do take the time to use the masks.

Here's the two best tutorial videos I've seen. Part 2 is where they get into the masking.

It IS 29.97FramesPerSecond. Each frame contains two fields. So its 60i (means 60 Fps time resolution wrapped into 29.97fps file). And indeed all this intelacing shit should be over since years... add some 3:2 pulldown, run this trough a format conversion...