@driftwood "My own tests confirrm 'reAQuainted' is making best use of quality macroblock QP. But I'll be happy to be prroved wrong. :-)"

Somehow I feel you're going to be right on this ;) thanks man! I'll check it out soon

I ran some tests today and you couldn't see any difference until you pushed the codec to demand more bit rate. Shaking a plant didn't do it. Playing with little beads showed some obvious clarity difference but the real magic came when I filmed blowing leaves in the trees on this blustery day. The codec in the stock cam began to fall apart and started throwing out data.  Leaves became muddy, the dark woods behind them got blocky and the sky showed gradient lines. The normal stuff we're used to. The hacked version held it all together and showed none of this when the action happened. No muddy leaves, smooth sky, no blocky dark areas. So, I guess that's it. The codec has to be pushed, which probably wont happen at the getting ready or ceremony but will happen at the dark reception. 

It wouldn't span files. So, it recorded in 4.2GB chunks and then stopped. No crashes, just stopped at that point. I have to figure this out. But it is stable on the class 10 card. If I can get files to span then I will get the fast cards and go for it. 32GB gets me 24minutes. So, over a gig a minute. HUGE files. Vectorscopes are showing more color range and better graduation. It feels like a nice upgrade to your gear.  Just have to get it stable. 

Clean is green my friend.  Well, it can be. Soon we will all have clean perfect footage and then what the heck are we going to do?  :0)

Peace. 

Quite gobsmacked over the amount of emails and gratitude regarding INTRA on the GH2 we're getting here at Driftwood! It seems the story has gone global!!! I hope everyone has made a donation/s to Vitaliy so that we can all enjoy the fruits of his labour now and in the future. Without his endeavours we wouldn't be here now.
Think of the possibilities he could do to other worthy cameras if everyone helped him with finance so that he could employ a crack team of debuggers/programmers. We need a money raising scheme.

@driftwood you didnt see the 43rumors about you and my test videos? BOTH OF THEM!!!

@driftwood cau you make setting to trancend 32gb class 10
low setting but GREAT QUALITY :D
stable for all setting

@driftwood, white, no sugar, and don't forget the fucking custard creams.

@driftwood
Thanks for great precise work! :-)

@someone who needs this
This is not my usual extreme patch but a safe setting.
Even if an extreme stress starts, a flat line is almostly not made in cadence of Streamparser.

The first screen shot is a result of the test done moving and zooming with Stray's chart.
The second is a result of testing moving with test chart.
The third is the result of testing moving at 24H80%(30p).
Although the size of the I frame exceeds 1M in a bright place, under lowlight, it becomes the size of the same grade as Chris's 44M.
Since the weather is bad today, an outdoor test is not ready yet.
Since I think lowlight as important, I use the former NINJA patch, but probably, this may be sufficient if a bright place is main.


It can play in camera satisfactorily.
Of course, there is cadence issue.
It is appropriation from Chris's 44M except 24p.

NOTE:
It is not what is called cadence issue that has appeared in this first chart, and it is only based on a motion of my camera.
If camera moves with zooming from a top to the bottom on a chart, while a terrible stress will start, when moving upwards from the bottom, stress does not start so much.
It only seems that cadence has occurred according to the difference of the strength of the stress.
When a fixed stress continues being applied, cadence does not occur in this setting as like the second chart.
All tests are with ISO3200 SS1/800.

ADDITION: The result of 30p(24H80%) outdoor in 4th screen shot

@driftwood
Although there is no telling whether I am well told to you in my English, I understand your opinion. :-)
It is not what is called cadence issue that has appeared in this first chart, and it is only based on a motion of my camera.
If camera moves with zooming from a top to the bottom on a chart, while a terrible stress will start, when moving upwards from the bottom, stress does not start so much.
It only seems that cadence has occurred according to the difference of the strength of the stress.
When a fixed stress continues being applied, cadence does not occur in this setting as like the second chart.
Thank you for always pointing out the noticed place!

@hiroshisaito - "noise and gradient are much better than former patch(v3)." do you mean better than the gopstoppa patch? Thanks in advance.

@driftwood - Are you being coy, man, or do you really not know how good the new AQ3 patch is?

It's amazing. In low light, it's now passing Henry's admittedly flawed patch in bitrate. Totally reliable so far. We just tested gopstoppa, this new AQ3, Henry's, the old 220 gop1 at 160, 400, 800, and 1600. The AQ3 seems to win at all ISOs. Just got the stuff into the computer so will mess around more tonight if time allows.. but MAN!!! Thank you again is all I can come up with. This new one is a gift, really the filmmaker's patch.

Great example Perry. You see it in the grain in the bokeh. The way I see it is that these are now both great choices. If you want to sip a bit more with your cards, use quantmebaby, if you're going for max resolution use reAQuanted. --- unless driftwood is able to unlock more down the road. I assume Panasonic or Nikon will be begging him to come work for them sooner or later (this assumes they're paying ANY attention to what excited the pro/semipro customer).

Wow that English sucked ass sorry guys im at world of beer celebrating my baby with my brother