There has been a lot about this on this thread and other threads too. I agree anyway, nothing I have seen on the GH3 so far lights my fire right now, that may change I guess....... we will see. I posted a recent clip I filmed with the GH2 here...its not as pure as the magnifico clip cause its a music vid with a fair amount of effects and postwork, but if you watch or download it in 1080P then some of the outside shots are quite nice. Shot with Quantam 100 and the guitar solo shot with AN Boom

I just read in certain forum blog that in the last firmware all the creative profiles are gone like "High Dynamic profile". All but standard/vivid/natural/monochrome/scenery/portrait/custom.

Can anyone please confirm this? If that's the case i'm cancelling my pre-order... Thanks.

@mrbill

I don't but from what i heard so far there are no significant difference between -5(x4) and 0. And i still don't know why Panny insist in "wide dynamic sensor" thing when (personally) i haven't seen any over GH2 improvements regarding this until date. ... Any thoughts?

@aked Agree! I could look up a whole raft of GH2 videos and say "that looks awful".

Side by side comparison will tell the full story in time.

In any case, regardless of whether it is better or not, I will be getting it simply for 1080 50p 50mbps, sounds strange but that is what I need for my workflow.

http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment/reviews/microsystemcameras/129422/1/panasonic-lumix-gh3-review.html

http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/reviews/compactsystemcameras/129359/1/panasonic-dmc-gh3-hands-on-review

@under1979 - "This video is removed by the user."

@EspenB

If the GH3 had those features it wouldn't be a hybrid stills camera. What you are expecting from Panasonic is an AF100 successor not a hybrid camera for under $1500.

I agree its a shame that we see some things pop up in images we have seen but they aren't a deal breaker for me at least. the moire is very slight. I can deal with that and welcome the improved stills performance.

As it stands right now the GH3 has the best combined stills/video performance for the dollar period. The GH3 improves on every single aspect of the GH2 except 2 areas (aliasing/moire) and even then it is better than almost all other competitors out there in that area also (I love those who are upset with the GH3 moire but want to move to a D800 for twice the price and more moire). If slight aliasing and non colour moire are deal breakers then that makes sense for you to pass I get that. I guess I'm a glass half full kind of guy (and not disappointed that the glass isn't a pitcher)

Color Profiles.

Hi everyone,

I found this moire test with GH3, you may be interested...

http://www.mediafire...d6nazf7r25luaa9

My conclusion so far is that Gh3 is a little bite sharper than Gh2 but it gets until now a little bit more moire. Sorry to disappoint you, but GH2 also has moire, every digital camera has moire to a more or less degree. The conclusion that GH3 is less sharper in video mode compered to GH2 is because everybody dialed the sharpness to minimum, with may not be the best option.

I find this camera very interesting, compared to my DSLR's and I will buy two pieces in the spring.

I am starting to ask myself if they did not remove some of the picture profile in Video. They had a suppose hi-dynamic mode that is suppose to be the flattest mode. Have they removed it!!!!!!!!! Are they that stupid that even if they don't provide some log base profile and that they don't give you a way to do your own like Canon and Nikon; they decide to remove some of their profiles. Damn if it is true, if this camera does not show a good improvement in DR, I think I will loose a lot of interest in it.

If it is confirmed, I think that Panasonic is really starting to be out of touch. That the success of the gh2 in video is such that they can just slap a sticker on any camera and that a people will buy it.

Here is the link location again: http://www.mediafire.com/?d6nazf7r25luaa9 I hope it works, of not I will try we transfer.