Anybody found non glossy models?

The problem with non glossy screen protector mounted on top off glossy screen is that often the distance between actual pixels and surface is larger than on native native non glossy. So you loose more sharpness. So i will wait until a non glossy version is available.

Bought the Crossover 27Q with pivot base: http://www.ebay.com/itm/110869169169?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649

I will update with results!

Of the 3 most popular Korean monitors I found the Shimian QH270 to be most affordable. The Catleap Q270 is generally a little more expensive, with overclock potential and better aesthetics (IMO). The Crossover 27Q is even more expensive for a metal chassis, optional pivot base and the best look (Again, IMO).

The "accessorieswhole" eBay seller has a 3 dead pixel policy, 1 year warranty, proper power supply and 99.9% positive feedback on over 10,500 sales. Most sellers have a 5 dead pixel policy with varying warranties, power supplies and feedback. The price difference between the Shimian, Catleap and Crossover is very little from "accessorieswhole". That simplified the choice for me.

There are even more Korean monitors that I did not want to spend time researching. Also, I read that many ordering a "pixel perfect" monitor still find a dead pixel and of course other issues like bleeding, etc. There is a ton of info floating around on these monitors. Ultimately, you just have to sift through it and decide what is best for you.

Wow, accessorieswhole shipped the Crossover 27Q yesterday and I received it this afternoon. Overall the screen is excellent. There is one dead pixel at the bottom left and minor bleeding around the edges. I can't complain, my old LCD looks like it is covered in dust compared to this. I'm trying a pixel reviving program on my dead one. It most likely won't work but worth a shot.

If you have fluorescent light I'm afraid it won't look right :(

is there anyone who has had the chance to compare one of these calibrated with the right hardware to a studio monitor?

I just got a qnix from Korea and have tried a gt210 gt440 and a gt640. All with dual link.

I can see the boot screen and windows load screen but the monitor turns off about the time that windows should be starting up. If I plug in other regular hd monitors after start up, they are immediately recognized and work.

Any thoughts on what I could be doing wrong?

My Yamakasi Catleap's working fine on my GT640 (running in a 2008 MacPro / Mountain Lion), except I don't see the boot screen, just my desktop once the computer's powered up. Display sleep works fine. I've installed the latest CUDA driver, and I think the primary display driver part is handled by the OS.

I'd be curious if there's an extra step I'm leaving out to get the boot screen part working, but it's not really a big deal.

Love the Catleap; zero dead pixels although I didn't order anything special (perfect-pixel, etc).

so i have been looking at those and seen good and bad stuff,

come on all these pro in here whit excellent cameras, and no visual talks yet, no popper insight on color/calibrating/response time, ect

get on it guys we other nerds need some more info, and could be nice whit a visual experience too from forum members.

There is a definite issue with these panels and 'some' GFX cards. ATI 5xxx doesn't show POST on boot, but works fine otherwise. I know, because I have one. Essentially, it's the GFX card manufacturers fault, and I'm lead to believe most cards 'released' (not produced) within the last year should have no problem with it.

@Shaveblog

It is ok behaviour, as this monitors do not have LSI to support text and intermediate modes.
They are made to work in native resolution.

All is not well with my Crossover 27Q. It makes a high pitch noise when the screen is white. I made a recording for the eBay seller:

Hopefully, we can work something out...