Arri Rental, exclusive home of the Alexa 65, said it is exiting Atlanta at the end of this month as part of a “strategic shift” that will see it transferring rental equipment from Atlanta to its operations in Brooklyn, NY, and Burbank, CA.
Following the closure, Arri Rental will be left with four North American locations — Brooklyn, Burbank, Charlotte, NC and Vancouver, BC. The company said it planned to offer personnel from Atlanta possible relocation options in its remaining U.S. offices.
Arri is feeling best among pro cinema cameras manufacturers and even they have issues and will continue expenses cuts.
RED is in worse shape of them all and mostly doing raw video licensing milking that must be enough for 1-2 year survival.
Situation is just that it is big monsters who play on the field mostly.
And camera progress slowed down with rental prices constantly going down. Hence optimizations.
said it is exiting Atlanta at the end of this month as part of a “strategic shift” that will see it transferring rental equipment from Atlanta to its operations in Brooklyn, NY, and Burbank, CA.
Maybe Atlanta just stopped their government subsidies for movies? These things come and go.
Wow didnt see this one coming . You think Arri will slowely get into more competitive pricing like almost all cams have vk? Or they will always think of themselves as differnt and play on this is our prices take it or leave it type of strategy ?
You can buy an Arri Alexa Classic for $10K if you want to "go cheap".
Things that were "pro" and "elite" in 20th century are becoming household items these days. Video production is just an example. Pro camera market is under pressure by DSLRs, DSLR market is under pressure by phone market, most people don't need a dedicated camera these days. And top-segment smartphone market is under hard pressure by Chinese manufacturers. Those who stick with old ways don't understand trends. They will easily be extinct any time soon.
Same thing is happening with stock media services. Audiojungle revolutionized royalty-free music market that was once ruled by companies like De Wolfe with exorbitant license prices. Now they are under pressure by subscription services like Artlist that offer unlimited downloads and very liberal licensing policies with affordable monthly/yearly subscription instead of per track fees.
I think Blackmagic is a good example of riding the wave. They take pro features and introduce them to a much broader audience at more affordable prices. They dropped the price of once very pro oriented Davinci Resolve to a more affordable range and play dumping policy by even giving it away for free in a still impressively functional version. They will rule NLE market one day. Who needs Adobe subscription if you can have similar functionality for free?
And that's how Google gained their monopoly on mobile device market, by giving away Android for free and capitalizing on the massive user base indirectly.
It's sad that some companies stick to their old ways and don't learn the modern ways of doing business.
And DSLR manufacturers are doomed in their stupidity. As the market shrinks they all hike prices and shift their products to pro market and rich playboy market. Well the latter is indeed quite elastic, these people don't care about price, they rather care about hype. But the former is a very niche market. What you think will happen if they all start competing there? They will all go broke, there is not enough demand for these very specific tools to fit them all there!
And instead of dropping prices and gaining a much broader audience of bloggers etc by selling them yesterdays tech with a little "pro" hype on top and keeping thus Chinese copycats away they are losing this much larger market to Chinese. This is ridiculous.
It is not new ways and old ways. It is just different possibilities.
Google, as Amazon and Tesla are long term projects by financial capital. If needed that could always ask for money or organization help (read - media support, etc). Free Android is also long ago not much free even for companies, and for you it pays off with private data it collects and that they can use and sell.
Source of BlackMagic money during their companies buyouts and financing of fast growing development team is still not fully clear, but rumors are that they have top Singapore bank capital behind their banks from early days.
Thing that we are observing is called monopolization. BlackMagic is doing that they are doing not to please you or provide you free software.
Even this week we observed how monopolization looks in Adobe case, of course some fools can believe that BM is not the same, but it will be the same at the end.
Most probably in NLE market we will have same artificial duopoly that we have on many other markets, BM and Adobe will control around 95% of market in coming two years. Avid will remain in their niche markets and all else will be loosing customers quickly.
This is mere speculation but I like the idea that Elon Musk is just a proxy of some guys behind NASA willing to privatize it. They need an "inventive" young guy to demonstrate the "ineffectiveness" of state owned space industry. At least SpaceX is what generates him some money. While Tesla is pure hype on a 100 years old tech.
The Chinese have switched CITIES to electrical transport and the press doesn't speak much about that. Instead they hype this clown that sends his expensive toy into space. https://cleantechnica.com/2018/01/03/100-chinese-citys-record-smashing-16359-electric-bus-fleet/ http://www.newsgd.com/news/2018-11/21/content_184164200.htm
As for Google, of course it is monopolization by dumping policies. Of course Android comes with strings attached. Of course its users pay for it in the end. But that's exactly why this scheme is ingenious. Find a way to make people believe that they get something for free and capitalize on that indirectly. Do this or die off. Because if you don't - your company will get eaten by someone else who does. That's what capitalism is about - sink your competitor and get his market share.
This is mere speculation but I like the idea that Elon Musk is just a proxy of some guys behind NASA willing to privatize it. They need an "inventive" young guy to demonstrate the "ineffectiveness" of state owned space industry
Microsoft had been made such way by top IBM management :-)
That's what capitalism is about - sink your competitor and get his market share.
On present stage - imperialism it is more about how to artificially make monopoly. Or perform set of mergers that effictively making one.
It is actually exponential rise (and diversity resulting from it) that saved capitalism for so long. But all such things come to an end.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!