@Mikelinn this little camera is awesome seen some side by side test VS the a7sII and it came out on top image quality wise. Image was clearer, dynamic range was the same.

Lab test shots

http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2016/03/22/sony-a6300-first-shots

Those two videos made me realize how great this little camera is.. @ 8bit it's still an amazing camera an produces amazing imagery.

@conscius; The description of video says:

'Color corrected and graded footage captured with the Sony α6300 in S-Log2 and S-Log3 at 1920x1080 with 50Mbps. Graded in DaVinci Resolve. We used EF lenses with a Metabones adapter: Canon 24-105mm F/4 and Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 DG HSM II. We only had the Alpha 6300 for a couple of hours so we can't say much about the camera yet.'

newshooter test in EBU lab: Surprising results ‘not suitable for use in general broadcasting’

He suspected that “the down-scaling from 3840×2160 to HD has used a simple algorithm, probably linear or cubic interpolation.” Simply put, the HD images from the camera are not really suitable for broadcast.

Next, Alan examined the UHD 4K record mode. Here things started a little better. He noted that “the camera is resolving detail all the way up to the limits (of UHD resolution)”, but then discovered that there is no 4K optimised optical low pass filter in front of the sensor and as a result aliasing occurs. He said: “Detail at higher frequencies is reaching the sensor and causing more out-of-band aliasing.”

http://www.newsshooter.com/2016/03/31/newsshooter-sony-a6300-ebu-lab-test-by-alan-roberts-surprising-results-not-suitable-for-use-in-general-broadcasting/

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-a6300/7

here's his white papers from bbc

This one I know. I just do not get statement I talked above.

May be he is very good at measurement but does not know a thing about image processing and AA filters? Especially at the time when image processing and AA filters can be main reason for performance difference?

He just does his testing from a purely Video centric point of view as if these were true video cameras and not dual purpose hybrids. So it comes across as idiotic to a reader that does realize why these DSLR/DSLM cameras don't have AA filters designed for video. For his very strict technical purposes tho that is immaterial.

First part is not related to photo side at all.

And AA stuff must be written completely opposite, not regarding any photo or video, but just from technical side.

I heard rumors about a a6400 with active cooling