Not having much joy with grading with the GH4 yet. Trying to use any of the filmconvert stuff seems to bring out contrasty images not please to the eye with strange colour tones. The most success has been from using the rec709 luts in the impulz pack. These luts only produce small colour changes but are pleasing to the eye none the less.
@Imackreath Sounds like your original shots are way to saturated/coloured/hard to do any serious grading if only rec709 luts do anything pleasing. If you need real grading (not talking about colour correction, the first step one should take) I also find it tough to get clean flat stuff out of the GH4. Neutral with everything toned down en a small +in the highlights en - in the highs might work.
@alexanderkooistra Not sure what you mean by "small +in the highlights en - in the highs"?
I have been using the natural profile on all 0's, seems to be the best colour rendtion. Sharpness and contrast need to be turned down on lumix lenses but on my voigtlander keeping these at 0 seem fine.
typo, I meant: + in de shadow - in the highlights (curve adjust). The fact that you want "best colour rendition" while capturing has as a result a colourful picture out of the cam.... and thus less grade-able. Thats always the choice you have to make. Colourful and accurate representation out of cam..... or easy and flexible with latitude in post.
I'm still happy with : Natural -5 -5 -5 -2 0
and in the curves +1 shadow en -1 highlight. Gives a clean output, put not highly gradable.
Anyone else use Supertone profile as their 'go to' setting?..
I thought 'Supertone' sounded interesting but after trying it I went back to Natural. I also find Natural or Standard the best for grading to get a nice balanced look. Using LUT's for grading will not give very good results unless you really know about the technical side of video. I would reccomend using the standard grading tools you have and learning how to use them properly. BTW I earn my living grading TV programs.
@caveport I will give supertone a try over the weekend. I initially used natural and like the colours from it, what settings do you have natural at and what lenses do you use?
@lmackreath I mostly use Natural with everything set to 0. I grade all my shots with DaVinci Resolve after editing I use the standard 12-35mm f2.8 Panasonic zoom (very sharp), Pentax 50mm SMC 1.4, Pentax f2.8 28mm & Pentax F 35mm - 70mm f3.5/4.5 zoom with macro. The Pentax lenses are fitted with cheap adapters.
I do adjust the highlight curve to -2 in bright sunlight and also adjust the colour tone towards yellow occasionally to warm up the image; mostly on cloudy days. I carry an X-Rite colour chart and use a white card to do custom white balance in camera. Getting the white balance correct in the camera is the best way to get nice looking and easy to grade images.
Shot on GH4 with Sigma 30mm 1.4 with Speedbooster W/O. ISO mostly on 400 & 800. Cinelike D using James Miller's M-Log Settings.
@Jazzwalker - great work, thanks for sharing. Nice framing and camera movement, well balanced stylistically. Looks really good, directorially and cinematographically. I think the thing which felt under-developed for me was the sound design and music. I think it could really of done with a subtle score and the SFX could well of been developed a lot more. But, well done its a great little piece.
@nobbystylus Thanks for the critique! Yeah, I can't say I'm any good at sound mixing or anything like that but I have an idea of what I want as far as atmosphere though. I think in the future I will find someone who can do all that for me instead. Thanks again for your input. :)
@CapionStudio What resolution are you set at on your Image & Color Video in the Aerials? Are you shooting 4K/24 with the Cinelike D settings and than render out to 1080p/24? Great video.
Sorry just seeing this now. Primarily shot in UHD and correct redered out to 1080/24p. Thanks for watching, here are our settings as followed:
Photo Style: Cinelike D Contrast: -5 Sharpness: 0 Noise Reduction: 0 Saturation: -5 Hue: 0 Rec Format: MOV Exposure Mode: "M" manual AFS/AFF; AFS Cont. AF: Off Meter Mode: Center Weighted icon Highlight Shadows: default I. Dynamic: Off I.Resolution: Off Master Ped: 0 Luminance Level: 0-255
New V-Log LUTs available now from AriColour! This includes all further updates and tweaks!
Anyone did the firmware upgrade to 2.3 and purchased V-Log yet? Can't get the download link working.
OK, after reading this http://nofilmschool.com/2015/09/v-log-l-workaround-panasonic-gh4-firmware-imaging-app it seems they have disabled the firmware link to make it hacker-safe first? Hopefully they just drop the 100-buck price tag.
If that's the case, it is already too late...
here comes a total stupid question: I never worked with 10bit footage I only have a Geforce GTX970...10 bit not possible, am I right?
Why wouldn't it be possible?
it says only the quatro and higher priced models offer 10bit
can anyone recommend some of DELUT's VLOG LUTs and say what they do? I don't have the patience to go through 210 LUTs...I would have really prefered to have lesser LUTs but just some good ones with explanation for which setting they are good and what they do
I have developed LUTs to transform Cinelike D footage and V-Log footage into a fully logarithmic working color space optimized for color correction. In this color space, you can perform exposure compensation and white balance correction just as easily and accurately as you can with raw images.
Thanks to @mash for providing this footage.Question re sharpness setting on the gh4. The people here who set the sharpness at -5.. Is that because you do your own sharpness in post or you just think out of camera that leaving the setting at 0 renders footage too sharp? I tend to leave my setting at 0 and I think the footage looks fine but am always curious why others lean towards -5..
I don't want my footage to look too digital, at the same time I don't want it to be too soft or have to deal with any sharpening in post...
Your thoughts please!...
I do it for several reasons. The main reason that I do it is to match other cameras because the GH4 is really sharp at the stock settings. The other reason is to reduce the chance of moire/aliasing. To give you and idea how sharp it is I set the GH4 at -3, GH2 to 0 and my Nikon D750 to+3 to try and match the cameras. Prior to purchasing the GH4 I used -2 for sharpness on the GH2 and thought that was really sharp. The sharpness setting of +3 for the D750 is pushing the limit almost to the point of aliasing. So yeah the GH4 is really sharp but if you have nothing to compare it to its hard to tell.
The main thing to me though is what kind of lenses are you using? If you are using native lenses then you may want to consider setting it to -5 but if you are using older softer lenses then -3 or 0 might suffice. I don't use native glass on the GH4 I use older Nikon AIS/D series lenses as well as some G series lenses which are softer then using native glass.
Really though it all boils down to what you think looks good, because if it looks good to you and the setting achieves the overall look that you are going for then its all good. I personally think each scene or shot will need different lenses and sharpness settings depending on what you are trying to achieve.
Example lets look at photography which is very similar to video. Lets say I have a model that is in their mid 20's and they are in the fashion industry. Well I would setup my studio with my 28" beauty dish or 59" parabolic with out the front diffusion panel because I want a contrasty sharp image. Now on the other hand if I had an older lady lets say in her mid 50's there is no way that I would use the beauty dish or parabolic. Instead I would use my 60" soft box because I want a softer image to hide the wrinkles and such. Then from their in post I would work on the image further to perfect it to what I am trying to achieve in terms of the overall look.
Leeming LUT v126
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!