Personal View site logo
Something in common
  • image

    image

    image

    All of them have something in common, if you look carefully. It is called "democratization".
    Forced deindustrialization, free unrestricted markets propaganda, adding huge debt, in other words making new "advanced" colonies that just die slowly with all young population working in other places.

  • 12 Replies sorted by
  • It's called balkanization, where countries are divided into smaller and weaker entities, making them easier for the banksters to control and plunder their resources.

  • where countries are divided into smaller and weaker entities, making them easier for the banksters to control and plunder their resources.

    Balkanization has nothing to do with it. I suggest to check history of Albania first, as it seems like you posted first though you got in your head :-)

    And all three of them now teach their children in schools how horrible time it was before peak you see on this charts :-)

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev This is interesting. Is this linked to your ideas on planned economy? Would be interested to hear you elaborate. Thanks.

  • @matt_gh2

    LOL. It is linked to lies you see in media and how you can fuck people minds so they even love the process :-).

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev I understand idea of media "presentation of facts", and how many will "love the process". I just wasn't sure if your point was about socialism vs capitalism (and which yields better economies).

  • I just wasn't sure if your point was about socialism vs capitalism (and which yields better economies).

    It is mostly not about "isms" it is more about stupid propaganda that someone will do all good things for you and you need "democracy" and "foreign investments" (you can check "Capital in the Twenty-First Century" book where authors did good research and failed to find even one case where such thing significantly helped any country).

    If you want your country live good - prepare for fight, serious fight for resources, agro and industry protection, education, and huge number of other things.

    Want to just spread the legs and enjoy the process? Don't complain that you will live and feel like prostitute.

  • slightly OT but wow - this is bleak - nevermind the Aral Sea http://rt.com/news/249397-uzbekistan-cotton-forced-labor/

  • @robertGL

    I try to never believe such things as "Uzbek-German Forum for Human Rights". Usually, even if true, things are gotten out of context and published for some purpose.

    It was exactly "Human Rights" activists who did everything to get charts you see here.

  • "And all three of them now teach their children in schools how horrible time it was before peak you see on this charts" They are forced to teach their children the "truth". They build their national identity. Their neighbor is an empire, which has nuclear weapons and threatening them that it will use.When your neighbor says that your house is his, you are afraid.

    "...and published for some purpose." Everything is written for a purpose. Even you are showing this data for your purpose.

  • They are forced to teach their children the "truth". They build their national identity. Their neighbor is an empire, which has nuclear weapons and threatening them that it will use. When your neighbor says that your house is his, you are afraid.

    I am interested about that actually happening in the country, not media coverage and fairy tales of "national identity" and existing or non existing word threats.

    You have good science, both fundamental and applied? Manufacturers who use latest technology and not transfer everything to China? Education is good and comparable to top world example? Your social system is functioning? Most smart people have good place to work and you also do not have young people who are forced to leave country to survive? Well, congratulations, this and tons of other required things are attributes of truly good country where population is on the rise.

  • There are few countries that meet these criteria. Canada, Sweden, Norway, Australia, Japan? Are there natural growth is satisfactory? Is criteria in India or Bangladesh meet these ? I believe that these criteria are subject to a sufficient, but not necessary to increase the population was satisfactory. I believe that these graphs may but need not show the well-being of the inhabitants of these countries.

  • Canada, Sweden, Norway, Australia, Japan?

    Well, whole list do not include truly independent country with goals (yet they have many good pointed by me before attributes). Canada, Australia, Japan do not have independent foreign policy at all core points (one of the attributes of true independence). Sweden and Norway are very specific samples as it require understanding of unique energy, resources, territory and people situations in them.

    I believe that these graphs may but need not show the well-being of the inhabitants of these countries.

    Well, charts here have single purpose - so you spend time yourself and research how actual people live in actual countries and why. Without media polish and stamps.