@driftwood
I am sorry for my repeated continuation post.
However, furthermore, since it improved, I post.
Since I am poor at English, I cannot explain well, but this setting is stable rather than any old of mine, and frame size does not become extremely small at a dark place.

First seth.ini, the multiple of "1080p24 Frame Limit" is set to 1.2.
In camera play may not be possible.

Second setj.ini, set to 1.0
In camera play possible.

In these settings, I think that it is also good to set the value of AQ to 0.
Both of screen shots are the results of recording Pappas death chart vibrated.

However, since I may not understand one, why does frame size turn into the almost same size that the bit rate is different by 24H-88Mbps and 24L-66Mbps?
How do you consider this?

Thank you for your advice or hint.

Thanks @Stray! :)
Regarding limit, I got it. But why also 24L...

@Stray
Thank you carefully! :-)
Furthermore, when improving, I encountered the scene where 24L differed from 24H.
Since a setup of Bitrate is different, although I think that it is a natural result...
However, sometimes, this difference may usually be unable to be recognized.

@someone
Although it is persistent as usual;-) the setting which can use AQ=2 is stuck.
In the result of my test, both 24H and 24L were able to be satisfactorily used also in this setting.
The stuck screen shot is tested with shaked Pappas Chart, respectively.
AQ3 may be able to be used if it is not stress test but usual recording.

@bkmcwd

What do you mean by "Although it is persistent as usual;-) the setting which can use AQ=2 is stuck" ?

@bkmcwd look at the B frames using more buffer memory in the 88M. Youve probably got a bit more room to play with in 88M too. Keep testing :-)

@proaudio4
My English was strange? sorry!
The meaning is as follows.
Since it is continuing sticking many settings persistent repeatedly these days, although someone may seem "Not again!", I stick this setting which can use AQ2.
Although there is no telling whether a meaning gets across to you now, a great meaning cannot be found from the first...

Going higher... ;-)

@Stray
Of course, I want!
I will try!

@paglez Its probably a false positive in GOP1 - test my earlier setting on the PAL thread 720p50.

@Ulisse I know it stutters - now change it to 3 GOP or 12 GOP.

Three tests:

1. BKMCWD's 24H 88M AQ2 3GOP
2. STRAY's 24H 88M AQ2 MAX VARIATION
3. CBRANDIN's 66M AQ2 (original August 29th)

NOTE: These tests were done under:
A, Fixed lighting daylight lamps.
B. Same camera settings, f-stop, ISO, etc...
C. Two tests; (1. pappas chart framed) (2. graph paper framed)
I chose to include the "graph paper" test because it does not max out the i-frames
and allows us to compare differences easier.
D. Repeatable motion test (Motorized base fixed on tripod)
E. Static tests (2 minutes); Motion tests- motorized pan movement (~30 seconds)

_________________________________________________

1. BKMCWD's 24H 88M AQ2 3GOP (pappas chart)
Settings:
f-stop: 6.3
Shutter sp. 1/1600
ISO 3200

Pappas Death Chart
Results:
Passed during static check.
Failed for Motion error (stopped recording) at start of motorized pan.
Two Streamparser images below labeled:
bkmcwd 88M AQ2 3GOP.png
bkmcwd 88M AQ2 3GOP futher in video.png
NOTE: These streamparser images are from the same video (pappas chart). I just wanted to show that it
displays the issue earlier, then further in the video before it drops recording.

NOTE: Since this setting failed on the motion test (pappas chart), I did not run the graph chart test.
___________________________________________________


2a. STRAY's 24H 88M AQ2 MAX VARIATION (pappas chart)
Settings:
f-stop: 6.3
Shutter sp. 1/1600
ISO 3200

Pappas Death Chart
Results:
Passed static and motion tests.
Streamparser image below labeled:
88M AQ2 MAX VAR PAPPAS STRAY.png


Test notes (I omitted first i-frames from data results):
i-frames 1.05M smallest i-frame during motorized base pan
p-frames during static ~682K
b-frames during static ~320K



2b. STRAY's 24H 88M AQ2 MAX VARIATION (Less dense Graph chart)
Settings:
f-stop: 8.0
Shutter sp. 1/1600
ISO 3200

Graph Chart
Results:
Passed static and motion tests.
Streamparser image below labeled:
88M AQ2 MAX VAR GRAPH STRAY.png

Test notes (I omitted first i-frames from data results):
i-frames 905K smallest i-frame during motorized base pan
p-frames during static ~710K
P-frames during motion max ~800K
b-frames during static ~300K

________________________________________________

3a. CBRANDIN's 66M AQ2 (original August 29th) (pappas chart)
Settings:
f-stop: 6.3
Shutter sp. 1/1600
ISO 3200

Pappas Chart
Results:
Passed static and motion tests.
Streamparser image below labeled:
Chris B 66M AQ2 AUG29 PAPPAS.png

Test notes (I omitted first i-frames from data results):
i-frames 909K smallest i-frame during motorized base pan
p-frames during static ~220K
b-frames during static ~510K
Streamparser image below labeled:



3b. CBRANDIN's 66M AQ2 (original August 29th) (Less dense Graph chart)
Settings:
f-stop: 8.0
Shutter sp. 1/1600
ISO 3200

Graph Chart
Results:
Passed static and motion tests.
Streamparser image below labeled:
Chris B 66M AQ2 AUG29 STATIC GRAPH.png

Test notes (I omitted first i-frames from data results):
i-frames 794K smallest i-frame during motorized base pan
p-frames during static ~560K
P-frames during motion max ~630K
b-frames during static ~205K

__________________________________________________________

SUMMARY (& LESSONS LEARNED ;) ):

1. BKMCWD's 24H 88M AQ2 3GOP really looks good on the charts (very solid).
It just needs a bit more tweaking so it does not fail. (See images below)

2. STRAY's 88M AQ2 MAX VARIATION looks great and passes these tests.
If you directly compare STRAY's 88M (graph paper) tests with CHRIS's 66M (graph paper)
you can see that it offers a bit stronger i-frames (also motion vector frames are a bit stronger):
88M i-frames: 905K
66M i-frames 794K
88M p-frames (max motion): 800K
66M p-frames (max motion): 630K
88M: b-frames: 300K
66M: b-frames: 205K

PLEASE NOTE: These tests were performed under the SAME conditions. The camera was never moved.
The camera is fixed on a motorized base on a tripod.
During the motion test, the motorized base speed control was set and left the same for
all motion tests.

3. CBRANDIN's 66M AQ2 (August 29th) really perfoms well and has NEVER failed for me.

4. LESSONS LEARNED: Don't upload the same fucking files twice! LOL There are duplicate STRAY images below.

Thanks Stray.
I'm really impressed with your 88M AQ2 MAX VARIATION settings. Nice work!
I'm willing to bet bkmcwd will be able to fine tune his settings for stability.
I will compare his again with your 88M once he tunes it.