@AndyS. This will be my first and last comment about your request. Everyone here wants to help you make a decision about your purchase but all you have been doing so far is throwing some words out there without providing any tangible proof. you need to provide couple of samples of "filmic" look you have done using GH2. Only then people in this forum may want to help you by matching that look using GH4 so you can have some tangible proof to make your purchase decision. If you continue in the path you have been going, all you are going to do is develop a bad reputation for an unreasonable person not only in this forum but all the other forums that are reading this one. Unless you provide an evidence of what you are looking for, I for one will totally ignore your comments going forward. I don't know what else to tell you. Show us or stop. Sorry @VK for making my comments here. I'm done.
"..It is not ridiculous to want to make sure a camera is actually capable of a certain "look" before you buy it.."
What you and your ilk are famous for doing is ignoring the elephant in the room. To paraphrase a famous quote,
"It's the optics, stupid."
Case in point. The one clip you liked was shot with a lens that brings a certain quality to the camera sensor. And that's before the whole discussion about lighting. The camera is a capture tool. The optics the interpreter. So go ahead, buy the GH4 and get some outstanding lenses. You will have "cinematic" up the kazoo (or not, depending on your talent which I might add I'm unable to judge due to a lack of evidence.)
, I'm curious if anybody knows how to turn off photo review. I know this is a video thread, but, I find it annoying that while playing with the photography features the viewfinder is unusable for a few seconds after taking a photo.
in the custom menu - auto review - duration time - off
Topic cleared.
@AndyS First warning, use the topic we have, not this one.
Thanks @tired!
@dbp I use my canon fd 1.4 with and without the speedbooster on my gh3 and gh4 and they are both sharp as a tack wide open!
@tylerknight, is your lens sharp as a tack in 4k or 1080p?
Shot this today after some heavy rain in town!
Mostly shot at 96fps and everything in regular speed was shot in 4k UHD scaled down to 1080
"Man that 96 is soft though :(
Regarding earlier opinions and comparisons between the GH4 vs BMPCC, I have both and plan to keep both. When shooting detailed nature shots I prefer the GH4 - a film LUT was used in the grade of this 1st video. I think the post process workflow of the GH4 is easier than the BMPCC and a huge advantage in the field is that you can get away without an external monitor on the GH4. The BMPCC does have certain look that I also like especially on people shots - some day I will try some skin/people comparison tests with both cameras and try to match in post as close as I can. The 2nd video here of GH4 footage does have some skin shots in the early clips...Also check out the hat in the 2nd video - BMPCC could not have captured it so clean like the GH4!
@ezbzpop ...not transferring it to film when you are done... re: prometheus
i realize you are being sarcastic... but seriously... it's not gonna look like that at all unless it's transferred... regardless of acquisition format.
My issue seems to be macro blocking on the internal codec at 4k.... I shot with a GH4 and I'm playing with the footage and I'm getting frustrated at some shots looking utterly gorgeous... but then in high contrast areas there's macroblocking in places that don't make sense... like white objects... or white walls that are otherwise clean, but adjacent to spots where there's a dark object or both a dark object and a medium toned object there's crazy blocking...
@soupertrooper the lens is sharp in both resolutions!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!