@vicharris where are you based? US or Europe?
Don't be surprised if they drop a straight passive EF mount. I do know that they are considering it as of now, if it's not already begun.
That's the one I'll also get.
My adapter arrived in CA today, so I should have it in my hands tomorrow and will be shooting some sketches using it with Zeiss ZFs on BV1-MFT.
Remember to show us results :-)
"Hello Steve, At the moment we are not planning on making one for FD lenses"
That's a pity....
Looks like mine will be here today. I'll do some comparison shots with my Nikkor 35-70 AF-D with and without the Vizelex.
Vizelex? sounds like some kind of laxative product.
I have one on the way to San Diego, should be here tomorrow. I'll shoot with Nikon Ais and pre-ais as soon as I can and post them.
Nikon DX has a 28.4 mm image circle diameter, by my calculation. That's slightly larger than Canon's and Sony's APS-C.
28.4 mm x 0.72 = 20.5 mm.
GH2 16:9 non-ETC: 21.4 mm diagonal
GH3 16:9 non-ETC: 19.8 mm diagonal
BMCC: 18.1 mm diagonal
BMPCC: 14.3 mm diagonal
So on the GH2 a minimally covering lens is a bit shy of complete coverage. The quality of the coverage will depend on the particular lens used. I expect many APS-C lenses will be just fine.
Mine has shipped USPS priority Mail. I paid for the cheapest $5 shipping. The tracking# is in the USPS system and says it shipped from WAUKEGAN, IL 60087 (Where Fotodiox is located) not a warehouse in CT (Connecticut) as someone had mentioned. It will arrive on Mon. 7/1.
@balazer thanks for the calculations!
Okay. My adapter arrived today, probably a few hour ago. It was left on my door mat by the postman.
Build quality is excellent. Tight fit to the GH2 and the the Nikkor-S 50mm f/1.4 lens. Top notch.
Before I say anything about IQ, I need to test it tomorrow on a good, modern F-mount lens. I have a couple old Nikkor-S f/1.4's. I don't want to confuse their visual characteristics with those of the Light Cannon.
What I CAN say is that the image is significantly brighter.
I'll take a few stills tomorrow at my local camera shop and upload my findings. If Best Buy will let me try one of their lenses on it, I'll give that a go tonight!
@bwhitz, not so much a good way, unfortunately. Extreme blooming/diffused look wide open. I wouldn't rule it out for stylized shots, but you definitely wouldn't use it in general shooting situations.
I've now also tried it with my 35mm Nikon AI-s f/2 and 50mm Nikon AI f/1.4 lenses. Of the three, the 35 looks best wide-open. The 50 looks about as bad as the 24. Unfortunately that's not that useful to me, since the 35 effectively becomes a 50mm and I might as well use my 24mm without an adapter at that point (or the 20mm pancake).
But maybe I just have really old soft glass! I still await the verdict from the more pixel-peeping oriented around here. I will say even if you rule out shooting wide-open, the wider field of view (versus a cropped window) is compelling in bokeh/aesthetic terms. And once you stop down a little, like f/2.8 or f/4, it looks very good. So maybe it's just the prime glass I have that doesn't perform well wide open.
Another interesting thing about this adapter is it has a preset aperture function. I'm not sure why it's on there, but it has four settings, at one extreme you can move your lens aperture and it stays wide open, at the other you have the full range of stops, in the middle you get degrees of stopped down. There's no manual to elaborate on this function; I hope I'm missing something useful here.
@vicharris The four settings on the adapter don't change the aperture, they just limit (or not) the movement of the primary aperture, if that makes sense. I've seen this before on the Jupiter-9, although at least with that one you do have a de-clicked aperture.
@vicharris Ah, you know what, you're right - I'm forgetting this is also an adapter for G lenses that don't have physical aperture rings. Something I avoid like the plague most of the time :D
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!