Only Hayes-compliant material here, please! Kindly calculate inner thigh flesh area and divide it by dark or clothed areas to arrive at the quotient.

As for clothing, male and female garments must be separated, (as on a clothes line), by a neutral garment or an equal amount of empty space.

I have a pretty cool cartoon plugin effect that might look cool with it.

I don't know @VK. Are you sure that that would be wise?

I'm sure that by the end of the video many viewers would ask: "what was that gear again?"

Vitaliy_Kiselev I have nothing against it. In fact I still think about topless girls making camera and gear reviews :-)

If it's good enough for Steve Weiss at Zacuto, it's definitely good enough for VK. (just don't buy the gear...to expensive) http://www.zacuto.com/zacuto-models

@goanna

I thought this was the Hayes Act of 1963 that stated: "the angle of a male member cannot exceed that of the Mull of Kintyre"

However I can't find a reference on t'net to it. I feel sure that I read this about 20 years ago when I was involved in developing software that detected and blocked such material in email.

Anyway - your comment amused me!

Okay, it's up.

Be forewarned, there is nudity.

GH-2, Sedna, Nokton 17.5

I used the in-camera microphones, which turned out to be way too sensitive, because I had my Small HD in the hot shoe.

It's the first video I've edited in FCPX.

It took me a while. I'm 64.

And no longer a quick study.

Password is Swansong

RBD

Sorry to be blunt, but it is too raw for my taste.

I mean, she's all you said, beautiful, articulate, but it's like none of the pieces in this video fit together. I understand her answers but the questions are missing. The way you show her body (which is quite beautiful) seems forced, too simplistic and I can't find the right word in English but perhaps "undeserving".

Having said that I'd jump on the opportunity to shoot something similar if I had the chance. I'd probably like to use more than one camera, some fixed framing close ups and some intentional defocus or dynamic focus. That allows a lot more flexibility in editing where I think that one cut would benefit from some silence to break that rigid rhythm.

This is all too easy to point out but I really think this could be much improved with proper planning and means. On the other hand, it could break all the spontaneity and ruin the shot. It was ultimately your call.

Thanks for sharing and again, I'm sorry for being blunt.

I will strongly agree with @duartix and @brianluce

a camera is for the most part an artists tool, similar to a paint brush to a painter the human body can also be considered art lol the lack of creativity butchers the whole idea, I would remove this video and MAYBE consider a 2nd attempt. This just reminded me of the start of a porn scene doing a nude interview for an audition without the next step being taken, the video did end abruptly, so who knows.

This doesn't feel right. I'm not going to watch it all.

What's important here is the story. And here, that's mainly audio. It's clean audio of her telling what she thinks about the subject. Even if you like spontaneity, this has to be planned out. Plan out where you want to go from beginning to end. Preferably, you have to record the audio -- the interview -- in such a way that you can rearrange it. And she can tell her story in her clothes. I would shoot it in multiple angles, and with more motion, and in a beautifully lit studio. Then you can edit it.

This main interview with the lady in clothes can be intercut with her nude body, if you wish. You have to cut it to the words she uses, like touch (cut to hands) etc. But shoot it more closely, intimately, softer, and dare I say, more beautifully. If you shoot something like this, your subject deserves it. That's just my own estheticism.

The story is important, not just filming a lady in the nude, or having her tell something. The story is going from A to B. The question of this story is: What is intimacy? Is it the body? The nude? Sexuality? Or is it knowing each other? The mind. That's your story. Your visuals have to stimulate her words, her story. Capture great audio, and give great visuals to move us through the story.

This is just my opinion and ideas. Please take it as constructive criticism. And you may criticise my ideas too. :-)

@Vitaliy_Kiselev

Yes, you can tell others to do it themselves. But I think you can judge things as a member of the viewing audience. I don't think you have to be able to create what you talk about in order to have a conversation. You can tell how you'd like to see something. I think, many times, people have good perception and sensibilities, but not the ability to do it themselves right. That's where hiring other people to create your vision comes in.

@vitaliy_kiselev Being that I have had 15+ years of experience it the video world, and attended New York Film Academy for editing, if I was to make an attempt at something involving nudity, I guarantee it would be more than this, more than one angle. There is absolutely no creativity from the camera man.

@GravitateMediaGroup

So, show us your version.