The above video clip was shot at f4.5 (fixed) at 1/250th on this cloudy day (no ND!). The wind and traffic noise were so loud that it was not possible to detect any zoom noise. But the camera did not appear to lose or shift focus while zooming, and AF was used (Catalyst Browse, using the downloaded original clip).
Even more bad samples
https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/06/sony-rx100-vi-sample-images/#
Do you have original Canon 5D with 70-200mm F2.8 as travel camera now?
Endgadget's "sample" pictures are very similar to those provided by DPReview https://www.dpreview.com/samples/4971821110/sony-cyber-shot-rx100-vi-sample-gallery-updated
Evidently both attended a Sony-sponsored event and shot the same models (and buildings).
Leaving aside the capture of review sites by manufacturers supplying exclusive access to new products and boondoggles (see
),what I learned from these photo examples is that long lenses are of limited use. Except for the boring close-ups of the Empire State building, almost none of the photos made use of a long(er) telephoto. Perhaps if Sony had sponsored for its invitees an African safari we might have some more interesting, if still quite irrelevant for most users (even the rich ones), examples.
Manufacturers now formed special pack who attend such events. This allows very tight control over information.
Yeah - Sony totally had an announcement event for it. Matt Granger did a video about it.
And of course Sony does these events - it's a similar reason that the studios fly movie review vloggers out to premieres and whatnot. It keeps them out of the "sponsored review" category while making the reviewer feel important and inspiring them to keep the positive reviews flowing in, lest they not get invited to the next launch event.
(At least Granger was pretty skeptical of who would be in the market for a $1200 point and shoot camera, though he still was pretty positive in his assessment of it)
It keeps them out of the "sponsored review" category while making the reviewer feel important and inspiring them to keep the positive reviews flowing in, lest they not get invited to the next launch event.
With modern media trends it actually means that you control all actual sources of information. As search algorithms prefer information that appear first and that have more views (rightly connected to being first).
We have here some kind of cartel agreement between corporations and press.
Kai's review sample was overheating on a hot day, but I guess a little bit less than the Mark V.
The video samples have the awkward "no nd filter on a sunny day makes a fast shutter" look that one would expect from this camera.
... and at around 9:40, his battery runs out.
Also, funny frame of Philip Bloom looking vaguely caveman-like at 6:21 or so.
Review
http://photoreview.com.au/reviews/advanced-compact-cameras/fixed-lens/sony-cybershot-rx100-vi
Video performance review
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-cyber-shot-dsc-rx100-vi-m6/6
The big advances of the VI over the predecessor RX100's is the long zoom and the ability to use the touch screen to focus. For videographers, an issue is whether you can zoom while shooting - is the zoom too fast, too wobbly, noisy, does it lose focus? And for the touch screen: what do the focus pulls look like? So this 'rich traveler' user of the camera shot a video showing the full length of the power zoom and some focus pulls:
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!