That looks pretty terrible. No worse than other comparable cams, but those are pretty terrible too.
The A7R II has horrible RS in it's highest 4K quality (APS-C) and a bit less in FF 4K. Choose your poison!
For a while we'll still have to decide between high DR and sensitivity or global shutter with less sensitivity and DR – think URSA.
If my logic is not wrong, this test shows combined RS of a6300 and the camera that shoots the back of a6300. So it is meaningless.
The a6300's display is probably updated globally, in which case the rolling shutter of the camera behind the a6300 wouldn't contribute to skew.
Rolling Shutter
And he is in the PINK!
The color on that video does not look good at all to me.
This camera is looking pretty remarkable for it's price point. About the only thing I'm worried about at this point is rolling shutter.
I think that footage from Behiri isnt graded, look like as flatted profiles.
:)
http://www.dpreview.com/samples/3278770867/sony-a6300-real-world-samples
DPReview fumbles the ball again. Most shots are underexposed from shooting in M, and the shutter speed on the sports shots were mostly too slow. On the bright side, RAWs to play with!
G7 its a great rival, only in high ISO look the Sony look better.
Surprising how G7 stacks up against the Sony. Nice.
And I the color of the pool of the G7, so, the color of pool of A6300 is more realistic.
Looks promising. Can be interesting to read here comparison with GH4 and G7 with lot of samples.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!