With GH4 and especially now with GH5 it is partially (or even mostly) marketing decision.
Plus all team who makes core decision is almost exactly same, so, all same issues.
@matthere
ISO 400 & he calls this "low light test"?? we're kidding right?
lot's of banding in the image...
@yiannis_zack yep the test doesn't seem entirely serious, he used 4K 60p 8bit ISO 400 with a 25mm 0.95 Mitakon Zhongy speedmaster lens.
I added this here as I think it's interesting to see the sensor being starved of light, would have liked a wider ISO range testing in it, but found it interesting despite some 8bit banding.
Been to Jessops today, where they had the GH5 for demo, could hold it, shot with it etc, obviously no take away of photos allowed.
Some real nice improvements. Some thing I couldn't get working, but for a 0.5 FW its looking good!
Finally they have exposure onscreen, while changing ISO.
Recording to Atomos Shogun
Wow, thanks a lot @Vitaliy_Kiselev!
Suggest to use Flickr or such for larger things.
Also, you need to match color first before any ISO comparison.
I think before matching color on the Gh5, the exposure must be matched first, cause it's totally different vs the GH4.
One observation, looking into the Exif I see the firmware version is 0.5 (beta stage). :)
Sorry for 2Mt photo :)
GH5 photo is shot with 20mm II. GH4 exif dont tell the lens. Both are with AWB so it tells something about color/WB fidelity. Here are exif for both:
Panasonic Lumix GH5 sample images:
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_GH5/sample_images.shtml
@Eno It's a shame there are no shots of people to see how skin tones look.
@caveportcaveport , there is a photo with people in it: https://www.flickr.com/photos/cameralabs/31977256174
A bit too wide to evaluate skin tones.
@caveport , here's a portrait taken with the GH5: https://www.ephotozine.com/user/joshwa-136701/gallery/photo/lucy--studio-shoot--49924955
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!