Tagged with stabilizer - Personal View Talks https://personal-view.com/talks/discussions/tagged/stabilizer/p2/feed.rss Thu, 14 Nov 24 06:38:26 +0000 Tagged with stabilizer - Personal View Talks en-CA Wondlan Carbon Stabilizer and mini one https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/1613/wondlan-carbon-stabilizer-and-mini-one Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:05:01 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 1613@/talks/discussions
Hope to get reviews from our members soon also.

But here is review from other guys:


----------------

Few samples:





----------------------

Available at our deals.]]>
Interesting stuff: New stabilizer https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/2836/interesting-stuff-new-stabilizer Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:02:26 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 2836@/talks/discussions image

image

  • Material: Aluminum + composite plastic
  • Max height: 40cm (with tripod)
  • Max load bearing: 3kg

Not recommended.

]]>
(SOLD) For Sale: Laing Handheld Stabilizer P-03(xc) $200 plus shipping https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/6789/sold-for-sale-laing-handheld-stabilizer-p-03xc-200-plus-shipping Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:20:02 +0000 LaserGuidedTaco 6789@/talks/discussions Barely used in like new condition I bought it March 28, 2013. Selling it because I upgraded to a blackbird stabilizer. PM me if interested.

Payment accepted: Regular PayPal (fee included in price)

Shipping method: USPS

Shipping charge: Varies

Handling time: 2-3 days

Additional comments: Will ship only to the address on the PayPal transaction details page Buyer must have a PayPal confirmed address

]]>
Glide Gear Stabilizer Review https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/6440/glide-gear-stabilizer-review Tue, 19 Mar 2013 02:25:49 +0000 matt_gh2 6440@/talks/discussions Just got the Glide Gear Stabilizer and thought I would do a quick review. It's modeled off the Steadicam Merlin design. The build quality is very good. Bottom line - it works, and for $73 on amazon, it's pretty cheap. I did some test shots walking up and down stairs, as well as around the house, moving forward at times, panning at times...and it's smooth. It definitely removes all the microshakes you might get when trying to walk. I watched their 3 minute YouTube video which gives instructions on balancing, and spent 5-10 minutes working on balancing my GH2 with lens, lens adapter, and small rubber hood, and it was fairly easy to achieve nice balance. By the 3rd test shot, I had gotten the hang of it. A bit heavy after awhile, but nothing too bad, and I suppose that's normal for stabilizers that require you to operate it with one hand. At $73 it's a good deal, and with a reasonable amount of practice, I believe you could achieve some very smooth moving shots.

]]>
Balancing stabilizer https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/714/balancing-stabilizer Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:43:24 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 714@/talks/discussions ]]> Multicopter Reel with hacked GH2 https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/6033/multicopter-reel-with-hacked-gh2 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:01:59 +0000 karpo3 6033@/talks/discussions

I shot this last August. I got Flow Motion v2 hack and shot this 720p/50fps.

Thank´s all working around these amazing hacks :)!

]]>
Wondlan Mini Stabilizer .vs. Flycam Nano https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/5765/wondlan-mini-stabilizer-.vs.-flycam-nano- Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:18:13 +0000 Sph1nxster 5765@/talks/discussions Having now worked with both these handheld stabilizers i thought i would take the opportunity to give a fairly brief summary of the two and how they compare. Both these stabilizers have been used with both the GH2 + GH3 with a variety of lenses plus light when required.

FLYCAM NANO - £85

Initial setup for the Nano took around 3-4 hours, and was not a plesant experience. This would have been exaggerated by my lack of experience at the time with stabilisers but i had researched the concept and watched numerous videos on how to tune one and yet i was amazed at how difficult it was. Having spent nearly 6 months with the Nano, i found myself never truly able to get a perfectly tuned setup. It would work sometimes and then it would be placed on a table ready for the next shot and when picked up again it was out of balance. This would take some 2-3 minutes to sort out and sometimes I missed vital shots and had to abandon and go for the monopod. I must admit that laterally i ended up resorting to a rather crude method of balancing it, due to frustration, and this consisted of banging it until it was back in balance. I realise that this method ultimately knackered the whole unit but i was initially very patient with it.

  • PROS - Lightweight & Cheap
  • CONS - Difficult to adjust, not well built, weights at the bottom over complicate things (combined with little movement in the main shaft available)

WONDLAN MINI STABILIZER - £205

Of course, this lead to me purchasing a new stabiliser which after reading a lot of good things about Wondlan led me to purchase their Mini Stabiliser for just over £200. Being cheaper than the carbon model and smaller i thought this would be ideal for the GH3 + 12-35 lens. I am not joking when I say this, but from open box to flying... less than 5 minutes. I was amazed at how easily the unit could be adjusted and yet how stiff everything felt on it. I can literally run as fast as I can with this thing, place it down, pick it up and nothing changes. I have combined it with a Calumnet quick mount adaptor (manfrotto copy) and this works a treat at allowing me to jump from monopod to stabilizer and at the very most I have to do about 10-15 seconds of tweaks to get it perfect. The knobs at the side allow micro millimeter precision and with the scale at the side does not lead to subjective changes. What a fantastic bit of kit and it has re-ignited my enthusiasm for stabiliser shots once again!

  • PROS - Super easy to adjust, well made, looks fantastic (more professional IMO), massive amount of adjustment in both gimbal, shaft height and plate
  • CONS - Twice the price, bag is not padded (i'm scraping the barrel here)

I hope this helps with someone looking to take the leap into the world of stabilizers and not sure where to start.

]]>
So long, but thanks for the fish... (eye) - A Protest Video. https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/5603/so-long-but-thanks-for-the-fish...-eye-a-protest-video. Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:35:11 +0000 duartix 5603@/talks/discussions @Vitaliy_Kiselev: sorry if this is the wrong place, but I feel it covers so many topics (GH2, FlowMotion2, Samyang7.5mm, capture, defishing, AE workflow, Premiere workflow) that I wouldn't know where else to put it. Let me know if you want it moved.

The short story: 31-OCT, the day the Portuguese Budget for 2013 was approved. People gathered in front of the Parliament to say we're being governed by thieves. Not very original I know, but it's a great place to shoot video and take pictures (well at last until it degenerates into mayhem which is rare around this parts but not unheard of until very recently). This is how I worked it.

1) The extremely simple setup:

GH2, screen folded back as a monitor, Transcend 32GB class 10, Samyang 7.5mm fisheye (my favorite video lens), set and forget to hyperfocal, ISO 400 I believe, SS=1/25s. Flowmotion 2 was used as I never know before hand how much video I'm going to capture or how many photos I'll be shooting, so I need something that is very good quality but doesn't make me have to change cards when something very important is happening. If the card is pre-formatted (the extended, not the quick format) it has never failed me to span.

2) The capture:

This is all about getting there up front and trying not to shake the camera. The police until very recently (and only after a 1h stone shower) has been instructed not to charge, so it's an easy job, you just dodge the TV reporters and other amateurs like me. So, here's my first mistake: the aperture is fine, this lens is sharp as an axe, but should have upped the ISO and set a faster SS because in these situations you are always bound to get bumped and it shows in wobbles after software stabilization.

3) Defishing the Samyang:

Load the MTS into AE. Export as image sequence. Use a batch (http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/comment/69869#Comment_69869) to defish the images and import the output again to AE now as image sequence. The defishing was done using the Panini projection. It's loads more natural on people than Rectilinear, it preserves a lot more corner resolution and still manages to keep a few lines straight. This was the first export and not reasonably quick because the synthesis part takes it's toll: ~2-3fps.

4) Stabilizing:

Throw AE's Warp Stabilizer on the footage. Set the "Smoothness" to 15-25% (it will require much less cropping later) set borders to "Stabilize, Synthesize Edges" (again a lot less cropping) but drop the "Synthesis Input Range" to 0,2s otherwise you'll bog AE. In this kind of footage there is usually little point in using a higher value. Skim the footage looking for black borders and try to resize and reframe it so that they don't become evident. Note: defishing after stabilizing should make more sense as you would have more image to work with (defishing crops it) but from a few rough tries, the AE stabilization isn't clearly as effective when working on fisheye footage. This was the second export and a very long one: below 1fps.

5) CC & Denoising:

Used some of ColorGHear's gears, notably GHrain killer to kill a bit of noise and blockiness, but the footage was already very clean from the start and little color correction was used, just a little bit of levels adjusment. This was the third export and I believe it was even longer than the third due to the noise reduction filters: below 0.5fps.

6) The "so long" part: video effects, tracking and subtitling:

Translations were pretty quick, the hard and long part (at least until I found out how to smooth it) was tracking. It was fastidious to track people's features, takes a long time and needs constant review and adjustment. In the end I found out a few tricks (like increasing the tracking area) and smoothing the tracking points. This eased the job a lot and gave much better results. In the end I had to do it sometimes up to 3x until I was satisfied with it. In the process I had to learn a lot about tracking, smoothing, 3D objects, texting, transitions and light sources. This was the forth, the quickest and last export, probably around 10fps.

7) Audio mixing.

This was the part I was more ignorant about, but turned out to be pretty simple. Even though it's pretty rough, the footage is little demanding with so much crowd noise. It was as simple as importing the last video export from AE into Premiere, importing the original sound, importing also "Le Tigre - Dike March 2001" cutting and pasting a few pieces of this track and adjusting the volume here and there to serve the original events while leaving the words of the protesters audible when needed and off I was to the final export.

The resulting video can be found here:

Here are a few pictures of the event.

Anything more you may want to know about any part of the process I'll be glad to detail it.

]]>
Steadycam from France https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/5527/steadycam-from-france Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:07:53 +0000 haribabis 5527@/talks/discussions Hello. Any user opinions about this France made steadycam ? i found it 900 euros used. http://www.laigleparis.fr/english-mdv.htm

]]>
Opteka SteadyVid Pro https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/2519/opteka-steadyvid-pro Wed, 07 Mar 2012 09:54:52 +0000 soundgh2 2519@/talks/discussions Bought one for a laugh - will post results soon.

You can get yours also at http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-SteadyVid-Stabilizer-Camcorders-Supports/dp/B007FDE4Y8/

]]>
Proaim stabilizer kit quality ? https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/1487/proaim-stabilizer-kit-quality- Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:32:18 +0000 David_Cole 1487@/talks/discussions
Thanks for any info!]]>
Is Motion 5 (SmoothCam) in Final cut pro compared to warp stabilizer in after effects https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/1271/is-motion-5-smoothcam-in-final-cut-pro-compared-to-warp-stabilizer-in-after-effects Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:33:17 +0000 learrocket 1271@/talks/discussions
]]>
Interesting stuff: Sanda 100 stabilizer https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/794/interesting-stuff-sanda-100-stabilizer Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:43:25 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 794@/talks/discussions
This one is clearly very interesting.

Company added counterbalance.
Main goal is to remove twisting force on handle.

image
image

image
image
image


Compani product page: http://www.sanda100.com/steady_unica.php?ln=it&men=7]]>
What Kind of Quick Release Plate do I Need for a Stabilizer? https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/192/what-kind-of-quick-release-plate-do-i-need-for-a-stabilizer Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:30:13 +0000 Toronto 192@/talks/discussions
http://www.glidecam.com/product-1000-pro.php

There are all kinds of various quick release plates on ebay but some seem to be only half of a kit, different sizes, too big, too small, etc.

http://shop.ebay.com/i.html?_nkw=quick+release+plate&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=&_trksid=p4340.m570

If you look at the photo, the sliding plate at the top of the glidecam only has a few centimeters of space between the base plate, so the bottom part has to be thin enough to fit inside the 2 plate areas but I have no idea how to differentiate between something that will work and something that won't and I don't have money to experiment buying various ones, I would like to get one that will work the first time.

If anyone can help me please check out ebay or elsewhere and send me a few links of plate kits (both the piece that will be permanent attaching from underneath the top plate of the stabilizer, and the piece that will then attach onto that first piece, then the 3rd piece or second piece that is permanently screwed into the camera that has some sort of switch function that would be easy to get to under a GH1 so that the camera can be easily attached and removed to the first or second piece without anything needing to be retightened after balancing every time you want to take off, put back on, take off, put back on.

Thanks very much.]]>
FlyCam Ultralite https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/149/flycam-ultralite Sun, 29 May 2011 17:13:46 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 149@/talks/discussions Up to this moment only 6000 model had not awful platform.

image

image

Don't really like the handle much (on their FlyCam 6000 it is better shaped, and platform is also not bad).

image

http://cgi.ebay.com/Flycam-Ultralite-arm-brace-stabilizer-dv-hdv-dslr-/280678826140?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_2&hash=item4159c3009c

It could be interesting to compare to 6000 model, as former has better looking weight mount allowing to set monitor on proper place.]]>