The choice of macro converters available recently increased when Panasonic started to ship its 37mm filter thread macro converter, which can be mounted on a Panasonic 14-42mm Vario X pancake lens.
I had bought a macro converter from Siocore for the 37mm filter thread, earlier, and I would like to know how it compares to the one Panasonic is now selling (for more than twice the price).
To allow a comparison, I shot an object with many small details that many people should have access to - a 50 Euro bank note.
The focal length has been set to 42mm (the longest possible with this lens), and I tried to adjust the camera to object distance as narrow as posible, such that the autofocus was displaying a happy green frame. (I guess this distance adjustment method is not much more precise than +- 3mm, but that should be enough.
The center of the shot is aimed at the "roof top" inside the "5" of the "50", I think that is easy to replicate if you want to take another sample shot.
Light source was thermonuclear (the Sun :-), the aperture 10.
The attached image is the full frame as extracted from the raw .RW2 file (the only postprocessing applied while converting the RAW to JPEG was white balancing - no sharpening, no noise reduction or such).
I would be very interested to see results from other macro converters, especially regarding minimal focus distance / minimal object size.
Here are some sets on flicker I recently shot with my Nikon 50mm f1.8 and a macro tube. Some at full extension, some not. Not sure which were which. I also recently did a bunch of closeups of pancakes, which I'll be posting sometime soon.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/61324763@N00/sets/72157629871686919/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/61324763@N00/sets/72157629890674981/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/61324763@N00/sets/72157629503538000/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/61324763@N00/sets/72157629868545665/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/61324763@N00/sets/72157629507251102/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/61324763@N00/sets/72157629895400857/
@5thwall: Thanks for the links, really nice pictures, but I'm afraid that the very different objects shown there would not allow for a comparison with shots taken by others who do not have them at hand... :-)
@Kihlian: Very interesting to also see a sample where macro tubes (instead of a converter lens) were used - thank you! (Personally, I like about the converter solution that it does not require to remove the lens for mounting. I wonder whether there are other pros and cons regarding converter lens vs. macro tubes.)
@tonalt: I did not do anything special regarding sharpness, in fact the only postprocessing I did when converting the .RW2 into a .JPG (using RawTherapee) was to white balance the picture - no sharpening, no noise reduction, no other fancy stuff. (The demosaicing algorithm used by RawTherapee was "Amaze".)
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!