Doing a photo comparison with a hacked GH2, and then formatting the SD and and then taking pictures with the same GH2 but this time unhacked

Beer:

1. Helios 44-2, No hack.

2. Helios 44-2, FlowMotion v2.02

3 Minolta 28mm, Driftwood Quantum

4 Minolta 28mm, FLowMotion v2.02

5 Helios 44-2, FlowMotion v2.02

Windowed trees:

6 Minolta 28 mm, No Hack.

7 Helios 44-2, No Hack. -

8 Minolta 28mm, Apefos THE END

Dog shots:

9 Helios 44-2, No Hack.

10 Minolta 28, No Hack

11 Helios 44-2, Apefos THE END (flash)

12 Minolta 28mm, No Hack (out of focus)

Patio umbrella:

13 Helios 44-2, No Hack

14 Minolta 28 mm, No Hack

15. Minolta 28mm, Apefos THE END.

I'm having trouble seeing that much of a significant difference, though the lines from the paneling on the side of my house are clearly more pronounced when I used FlowMotion as opposed to the unhacked version.

THE END seems to restore a lot of the color, but not much else.

Was there something I was supposed to instantly recognize in the images that were hacked? Still really good quality, but I'm unsure if I actually used them correctly. After successfully installing the hack to my camera via SD, it gave me that notorious message, and obviously I continued with the installation, and waited roughly 30 seconds to a minute, as everyone says. I know it must have worked because my camera straight up froze several times while trying to shoot.